From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heerling v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan 20, 2022
331 So. 3d 898 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 1D21-3293

01-20-2022

Shane HEERLING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Shane Heerling, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Shane Heerling, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Osterhaus, Kelsey, and Jay, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Heerling v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan 20, 2022
331 So. 3d 898 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Heerling v. State

Case Details

Full title:Shane HEERLING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jan 20, 2022

Citations

331 So. 3d 898 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)