From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heenan v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 1990
158 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

February 20, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Saladino, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, with one bill of costs to the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs, and the motion is denied.

On February 2, 1985, the plaintiff, a priest who was assigned to the Roman Catholic Church of Maria Regina, was injured while using a snowblower on the church premises. The plaintiff commenced suit against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, alleging that the snowblower was defective and that the diocese was negligent in maintaining the equipment. After the Statute of Limitations had expired, the plaintiff learned that the church, not the diocese, was, in fact, the owner of the snowblower and, thus, responsible for its maintenance. The plaintiff, therefore, sought leave to amend his complaint by adding the church as a party defendant. He alleged, in support of the motion, that the church and the diocese were "united in interest" (CPLR 203 [b]), and that the expiration of the Statute of Limitations did not serve to bar his claim against the church. The Supreme Court granted the plaintiff's motion and this appeal ensued.

We find that the Supreme Court erred in permitting the plaintiff to amend his complaint by adding a party against whom the Statute of Limitations had run. The record establishes that the diocese and the church are separate and distinct business entities (see, Capital Dimensions v Oberman Co., 104 A.D.2d 432, 433-434), whose affiliation is insufficient to establish a unity of interest for purposes of this lawsuit. Accordingly, interposition of the claim against the church cannot be deemed to relate back to the date upon which the diocese was served.

In view of the foregoing, the plaintiff's motion for leave to amend his complaint should have been denied. Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Heenan v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 1990
158 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Heenan v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL F. HEENAN, Respondent, v. ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ROCKVILLE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 20, 1990

Citations

158 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
551 N.Y.S.2d 555

Citing Cases

Samide v. BROOKLYN DIOCESE

The plaintiff's amended complaint alleges that the defendants "knew of defendant Thompson's abusive and…

McGovern v. ST Cyril Methodius Roman Catholic Church

Counsel for the Diocese and St Cyril cites to a case that they claim holds that parishes within a diocese…