From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hedworth v. Chapman

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Sep 21, 1961
132 Ind. App. 222 (Ind. Ct. App. 1961)

Opinion

No. 19,577.

Filed September 21, 1961.

APPEAL — Time for Filing Briefs — Reply Brief — Rules of Supreme Court. — Where appellant did not file his reply brief within the fifteen days permitted by Rule 2-15 of the Supreme Court, nor did he apply for an extension of time within which to file said brief, the reply brief is ordered stricken from the record.

From the Benton Circuit Court, Everett L. West, Judge.

William Wallace Hedworth, appellant, takes this appeal from a judgment in favor of appellees, Charles H. Chapman and Alvona L. Chapman. Appellees have filed petition to strike appellant's reply brief.

Reply brief of appellant ordered stricken from the record.

J. Frederick Hoffman and Kelly MaHanna, both of Lafayette, for appellant.

John R. Lynch and Robertson Lynch, of Lafayette, for appellees.


This cause was submitted on the 6th day of February, 1961. Appellant duly filed his brief, and on July 26, 1961, appellees duly filed their brief with this court. The time for appellant to file his reply brief expired August 10, 1961. However, said brief was filed on August 11, 1961.

Indiana Supreme Court Rule 2-15 provides that an appellant is permitted to file a reply brief on or before fifteen days after appellee has filed his brief. Appellant did not file his reply brief within the fifteen days permitted by Rule 2-15, nor did he apply for an extension of time within which to file said brief.

Appellees have filed their petition to strike appellant's reply brief for failure to file the same within the time provided by Rule 2-15. Appellant admits in his answer in opposition to appellees' petition to strike that, because of miscalculation of time, he filed his reply brief a day late.

Appellant not having filed his reply brief in compliance with Rule 2-15, appellees' petition to strike it from the record must be sustained.

Appellees' petition is sustained, and the Clerk is ordered to strike appellant's reply brief from the record.

NOTE. — Reported in 177 N.E.2d 44.


Summaries of

Hedworth v. Chapman

Court of Appeals of Indiana
Sep 21, 1961
132 Ind. App. 222 (Ind. Ct. App. 1961)
Case details for

Hedworth v. Chapman

Case Details

Full title:HEDWORTH v. CHAPMAN ET AL

Court:Court of Appeals of Indiana

Date published: Sep 21, 1961

Citations

132 Ind. App. 222 (Ind. Ct. App. 1961)
177 N.E.2d 44