From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hedrington v. David Grant Med. Ctr.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 12, 2023
2:22-cv-0074 KJM DB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-0074 KJM DB PS

09-12-2023

ORLONZO HEDRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. DAVID GRANT MEDICAL CENTER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On June 5, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. The time for filing objections has expired, and plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 5, 2023 (ECF No. 62) are adopted in full;

2. Defendant's December 23, 2022 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 40) is granted;

3. The complaint filed January 10, 2022 (ECF No. 1) is dismissed without leave to amend; and

4. This action is closed.


Summaries of

Hedrington v. David Grant Med. Ctr.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 12, 2023
2:22-cv-0074 KJM DB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Hedrington v. David Grant Med. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:ORLONZO HEDRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. DAVID GRANT MEDICAL CENTER, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 12, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-0074 KJM DB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2023)