From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hedrick v. Pine Oak Shipping, S.A

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 27, 1984
733 F.2d 1335 (9th Cir. 1984)

Opinion

Nos. 81-3588, 81-3597 and 82-3399.

March 27, 1984.

Raymond J. Conboy, Portland, Or., for appellant.

Paul N. Wonacott, Albert J. Bannon, Portland, Or., for appellees.

Before GOODWIN, PREGERSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER [2] (Opinion September 13, 1983, 9 Cir., 1983, 715 F.2d 1355)


It is ordered that plaintiff's petition for rehearing is granted, 531 F. Supp. 27, and that the portion of the opinion issued herein on September 13, 1983, designated "part III" be withdrawn and that the verdict for the plaintiff be reinstated. The final sentence of the opinion is amended to read: The district court's orders are vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Hedrick v. Pine Oak Shipping, S.A

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 27, 1984
733 F.2d 1335 (9th Cir. 1984)
Case details for

Hedrick v. Pine Oak Shipping, S.A

Case Details

Full title:QUENTIN HEDRICK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. PINE OAK SHIPPING, S.A.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 27, 1984

Citations

733 F.2d 1335 (9th Cir. 1984)

Citing Cases

Irving v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

We also stressed that the component manufacturer placed no limit on the states in which its castings could be…