Summary
concluding that the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his personal computer, but reasoning that “ person's reasonable expectation of privacy may be diminished in ‘transmissions over the Internet or e-mail that have already arrived at the recipient’ ” (quoting Lifshitz, 369 F.3d at 190 )
Summary of this case from State v. CarleOpinion
No. 07–496.
2007-11-13
Jerome T. HECKENKAMP, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Case below, 482 F.3d 1142.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.