From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hecht v. Flatto

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 9, 1936
158 Misc. 464 (N.Y. App. Term 1936)

Opinion

January 9, 1936.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District.

I. Bregoff, for the appellant.

I.T. Flatto, for the respondent.


There is nothing in sections 1077-a, 1077-b and 1083-b of the Civil Practice Act which prevents the bringing of an action against a guarantor for an unpaid installment of interest.

Order denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and order granting defendant's cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings reversed, with ten dollars costs; plaintiff's motion for summary judgment granted, and defendant's motion denied.

All concur. Present — LYDON, HAMMER and FRANKENTHALER, JJ.


Summaries of

Hecht v. Flatto

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 9, 1936
158 Misc. 464 (N.Y. App. Term 1936)
Case details for

Hecht v. Flatto

Case Details

Full title:FANNIE HECHT, Appellant, v. ISAAC T. FLATTO, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 9, 1936

Citations

158 Misc. 464 (N.Y. App. Term 1936)
285 N.Y.S. 949