From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heath v. Perry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Jun 23, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00188-TES-MSH (M.D. Ga. Jun. 23, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00188-TES-MSH

06-23-2020

KENDRICK D HEATH, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN CLINTON PERRY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

In his Recommendation [Doc. 26], the United States Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. 21] and deny as moot Plaintiff's motion for protective custody [Doc. 16]. No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's Recommendation; therefore, the Court reviews his findings for clear error. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). After careful review, the Court finds no clear error. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Recommendation [Doc. 26] and MAKES IT THE ORDER OF THE COURT. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. 21] and DENIES as moot Plaintiff's motion for protective custody [Doc. 16].

SO ORDERED, this 23rd day June, 2020.

[signature on following page]

S/ Tilman E. Self, III

TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Heath v. Perry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Jun 23, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00188-TES-MSH (M.D. Ga. Jun. 23, 2020)
Case details for

Heath v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:KENDRICK D HEATH, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN CLINTON PERRY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Jun 23, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00188-TES-MSH (M.D. Ga. Jun. 23, 2020)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Oliver

However, an inmate does not have a constitutional right to protective custody simply because he requests it.…