From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hearne v. Chavez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2022
2:20-cv-0557 DAD DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-0557 DAD DB P

09-28-2022

JOHN ANDREW HEARNE, Plaintiff, v. A. CHAVEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff has requested a second extension of time to file and serve an opposition to defendants' May 27, 2022, motion for summary judgment pursuant to the court's order of August 4, 2022. Plaintiff did not specify how much time he is requesting. In any future requests for additional time plaintiff should indicate the reason additional time is necessary and how much time he is requesting. Good cause appearing, this request will be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 91) is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and serve his opposition. No further extension of time will be granted for this purpose. Any reply shall be filed and served in accordance with Local Rule 230(1).


Summaries of

Hearne v. Chavez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2022
2:20-cv-0557 DAD DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Hearne v. Chavez

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ANDREW HEARNE, Plaintiff, v. A. CHAVEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 28, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-0557 DAD DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2022)