From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 20, 2002
824 So. 2d 965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 4D01-4017.

August 14, 2002. Rehearing Denied September 20, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County, James I. Cohn, J.

Otis Heard, Arcadia, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We reverse the summary denial of appellant's motion for post-conviction relief. Appellant's claim is that his lawyer was ineffective because he knew that the state could not locate its only witness, the victim of the alleged sex related charges, but did not inform appellant. If appellant had known, he would not have entered a plea.

The state's response rests on a memorandum in the state attorney's file indicating the state attorney was having difficulty finding the victim. The state's position, which apparently persuaded the trial court, was that this memorandum was a public record which could have been obtained by the appellant in 1997, and his claim is time-barred under rule 3.850. The record, however, does not demonstrate that this was a public record.

Appellant argues that the memorandum is newly discovered evidence, only recently made available to him in proceedings brought against him under the Jimmy Ryce Act. We cannot agree with the state that, based on this record, appellant's motion is time-barred. We therefore reverse for an evidentiary hearing.

GUNTHER, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Heard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 20, 2002
824 So. 2d 965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Heard v. State

Case Details

Full title:Otis HEARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 20, 2002

Citations

824 So. 2d 965 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Rivero v. State

Of course, counsel's knowledge of a plea offer cannot be used to defeat a defendant's claim that he was…