From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heard v. District of Columbia

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Apr 13, 1962
179 A.2d 723 (D.C. 1962)

Opinion

Nos. 2924, 2925.

Argued March 19, 1962.

Decided April 13, 1962.

APPEAL FROM MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CRIMINAL DIVISION, MILTON S. KRONHEIM, JR., J.

B. Dabney Fox, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Ted D. Kuemmerling, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, and Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before HOOD, Chief Judge, QUINN, Associate Judge, and MYERS, Associate Judge of The Municipal Court for the District of Columbia, sitting by designation.


Appellant was convicted of disorderly conduct and drinking in public. He contends here that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. The record convinces us that appellant's contention is without merit.

Code 1961, 22-1107.

Code 1961, 25-128.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Heard v. District of Columbia

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Apr 13, 1962
179 A.2d 723 (D.C. 1962)
Case details for

Heard v. District of Columbia

Case Details

Full title:James M. HEARD, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee

Court:Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Date published: Apr 13, 1962

Citations

179 A.2d 723 (D.C. 1962)