From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heard v. City of Blytheville

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION
Dec 21, 2011
NO. 3:10CV00272-BD (E.D. Ark. Dec. 21, 2011)

Opinion

NO. 3:10CV00272-BD

12-21-2011

LOUISE HEARD PLAINTIFF v. CITY OF BLYTHEVILLE, ARKANSAS, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

This case is scheduled for a jury trial on March 5, 2012, in Jonesboro, Arkansas. In the Complaint, filed November 1, 2010, Ms. Heard named a number of John Doe or Jane Doe Defendants. (docket entry #1, ¶7-13, 19, 22, 48) Ms. Heard will have fourteen (14) days from the entry of this Order to show cause why the Court should not dismiss the Doe defendants, without prejudice.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow 120 days in which to serve defendants. FED.R.CIV.P. 4(m). Ms. Heard has neither requested nor received an extension of time in which to serve the Doe defendants. The time for service, discovery, dispositive motions, and amendment of pleadings has passed without an identification of the Doe defendants. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the Doe defendants, without prejudice, if Ms. Heard does not show cause why dismissal is not warranted.

________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Heard v. City of Blytheville

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION
Dec 21, 2011
NO. 3:10CV00272-BD (E.D. Ark. Dec. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Heard v. City of Blytheville

Case Details

Full title:LOUISE HEARD PLAINTIFF v. CITY OF BLYTHEVILLE, ARKANSAS, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION

Date published: Dec 21, 2011

Citations

NO. 3:10CV00272-BD (E.D. Ark. Dec. 21, 2011)