Sacramento seeks sanctions against Agtegra, asserting Agtegra's arguments opposing transfer “were not warranted by existing law or a good faith, nonfrivolous argument for some modification or extension of existing law.” Doc. 28 at 2 n.2 (quoting Healy v. Supreme Court of South Dakota, 23-CV-04118, 2023 WL 8653851, at *12 (D.S.D. Dec. 14, 2023)). Sacramento further contends Agtegra's action has unnecessarily multiplied these proceedings and that this Court should impose sanctions that it “determines appropriate under 28 U.S.C. [§] 19[27].” Id.