finding that sexual assault was not authorized by the employer and was done for defendant's own personal interest
Summary of this case from Kocsis v. Cnty. of Sedgwick98-2285.
July 26, 1999.
Appeal from D.N.M.
Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.
finding that sexual assault was not authorized by the employer and was done for defendant's own personal interest
Summary of this case from Kocsis v. Cnty. of SedgwickIn Healey v. Scovone, 1999 WL 535298 (10th Cir. July 26, 1999), an unpublished decision by a panel of the Tenth Circuit, the defendant, an employee of the New Mexico Children, Youth and Families Department, had discharged all of his debts in bankruptcy and moved for dismissal pursuant to section 524. The plaintiff asserted that she was proceeding against the defendant in order to seek indemnification from the New Mexico Risk Management Division (RMD).
Summary of this case from Blackmon v. CrileFull title:Healey v. Scovone
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Date published: Jul 26, 1999
Accordingly, this case may proceed against Crile as long as Kansas law provides a way for plaintiff to…
Webber v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs for Curry Cnty.It is not the Court's responsibility to parse Plaintiff's general collection of facts into discrete claims…