From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heads v. McDade

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
May 9, 2019
NO. 03-19-00084-CV (Tex. App. May. 9, 2019)

Opinion

NO. 03-19-00084-CV

05-09-2019

Darius L. Heads, Appellant v. Brittney McDade, Appellee


FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, NO. 13-3062-FC4, THE HONORABLE JOHN MCMASTER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Darius L. Heads seeks to appeal the trial court's order adjudicating him in contempt for failure to pay court-ordered child support and ordering him committed to county jail. Contempt orders are reviewable only by original proceedings—by petition for writ of habeas corpus, if the person in contempt is confined, or by petition for writ of mandamus, if no confinement is involved. In re Office of Att'y Gen. of Tex., 215 S.W.3d 913, 915 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, orig. proceeding); Sheridan v. Office of the Att'y Gen., No. 03-14-00176-CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 12370, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 12, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.). This Court does not have jurisdiction to review contempt orders on direct appeal. Texas Animal Health Comm'n v. Nunley, 647 S.W.2d 951, 952 (Tex. 1983); see Hopkins v. Ott, No. 03-15-00606-CV, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 4556, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Apr. 29, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.). Consequently, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

/s/_________

Chari L. Kelly, Justice Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: May 9, 2019


Summaries of

Heads v. McDade

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
May 9, 2019
NO. 03-19-00084-CV (Tex. App. May. 9, 2019)
Case details for

Heads v. McDade

Case Details

Full title:Darius L. Heads, Appellant v. Brittney McDade, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: May 9, 2019

Citations

NO. 03-19-00084-CV (Tex. App. May. 9, 2019)

Citing Cases

Urbina v. Rangel

and because the "order of enforcement" is not reviewable on direct appeal, see In re Long, 984 S.W.2d 623,…

Seals v. Seals

We first note that contempt orders are not reviewable by direct appeal, and we therefore lack subject-matter…