From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Head v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jan 16, 2020
NO. 14-18-00925-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 16, 2020)

Opinion

NO. 14-18-00925-CR

01-16-2020

KEITH HEAD, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 399th Judicial District Court Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2011CR6417B

ORDER

Appellant's court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion requesting to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion was granted and an order to that effect issued.

In response, we have received documentation that the record was sent to appellant but have not received the certification from the clerk of the court as to the date on which delivery of the record to appellant was made.

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 56th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM Panel Consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain and Hassan.


Summaries of

Head v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jan 16, 2020
NO. 14-18-00925-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 16, 2020)
Case details for

Head v. State

Case Details

Full title:KEITH HEAD, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 16, 2020

Citations

NO. 14-18-00925-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 16, 2020)