From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

H.B. v. China Southern Airlines Company Limited

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 24, 2021
20 CIVIL 9106 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 24, 2021)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 9106 (VEC)

06-24-2021

H.B., an infant by his father and natural guardian, TAHSEENULLAH BARAKATI, and TAHSEENULLAH BARAKATI, individually, Plaintiffs, v. CHINA SOUTHERN AIRLINES COMPANY LIMITED, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated June 23, 2021, Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is GRANTED. Because the Court finds that the exercise of personal jurisdiction over Defendant does not comply with New York's long-arm statute, it does not consider Defendant's alternative forum non conveniens-based motion or Defendant's motion under Rule 12(b)(6); accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York June 24, 2021


Summaries of

H.B. v. China Southern Airlines Company Limited

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 24, 2021
20 CIVIL 9106 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 24, 2021)
Case details for

H.B. v. China Southern Airlines Company Limited

Case Details

Full title:H.B., an infant by his father and natural guardian, TAHSEENULLAH BARAKATI…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jun 24, 2021

Citations

20 CIVIL 9106 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 24, 2021)