From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hazen v. Quimby

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton
Jun 1, 1881
61 N.H. 76 (N.H. 1881)

Opinion

Decided June, 1881.

Justice may require the substitution of a new party for the original plaintiff, by an amendment of the writ and declaration.

FOREIGN ATTACHMENT. The defendant was defaulted, and a claimant of the fund in the hands of the trustee appeared. The plaintiff and the defendant agreed in writing that the writ should be amended by striking out the name of the plaintiff and inserting in place thereof the name of another person. The court allowed the amendment, and the trustee and claimant excepted.

W. H. Duncan and C. A. Dole, for the trustee.

W. H. Duncan, for the claimant.

J. L. Spring, for the plaintiff.


Justice may require the amendment. Judge of Probate v. Jackson, 58 N.H. 458; Folsom v. Insurance Co., 59 N.H. 54; Prescott v. Farmer, 59 N.H. 90; Buckminster v. Wright, 59 N.H. 153; Boudreau v. Eastman, 59 N.H. 467; Chauncy v. Insurance Co., 60 N.H. 428. The case presents no question of law.

Exception overruled.

SMITH, J., did not sit: the others concurred.


Summaries of

Hazen v. Quimby

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton
Jun 1, 1881
61 N.H. 76 (N.H. 1881)
Case details for

Hazen v. Quimby

Case Details

Full title:HAZEN v. QUIMBY

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Grafton

Date published: Jun 1, 1881

Citations

61 N.H. 76 (N.H. 1881)

Citing Cases

State v. Brunelle

Oregon v. Hass, 420 U.S. 714, 719 (1975); see also Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23, 34 (1963) (states are not…

Woodward v. Central Vermont Railway

Vt. Const. c. 1, arts. 1, 2 and 9. Williams v. School District No. 6, 33 Vt. 271. Tyler v. Beacher, 44 Vt.…