From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hazelwood v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 15, 2013
NO. 1:11-CV-00684 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 1:11-CV-00684

01-15-2013

DALE HAZELWOOD, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 10), to which there were no objections. The Magistrate Judge reviewed each of Plaintiff's assignments of error, and concluded the ALJ's finding of non-disability was supported by substantial evidence.

Proper Notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation thorough, well-reasoned, and correct. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS and AFFIRMS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation in all respects (doc. 10), AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff's DIB and SSI applications, and closes this matter on the docket of the Court.

SO ORDERED.

________

S. Arthur Spiegel

United States Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Hazelwood v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 15, 2013
NO. 1:11-CV-00684 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Hazelwood v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:DALE HAZELWOOD, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 15, 2013

Citations

NO. 1:11-CV-00684 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 15, 2013)