From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haywood v. Vance

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 5, 2017
154 A.D.3d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

10-05-2017

In re Keith HAYWOOD, Petitioner, v. Cyrus R. VANCE, Jr., etc., Respondent.

Keith Haywood, petitioner pro se. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Melanie Soberal of counsel), for respondent.


Keith Haywood, petitioner pro se.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Melanie Soberal of counsel), for respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

ACOSTA, P.J., RENWICK, WEBBER, OING, MOULTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Haywood v. Vance

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 5, 2017
154 A.D.3d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Haywood v. Vance

Case Details

Full title:In re Keith HAYWOOD, Petitioner, v. Cyrus R. VANCE, Jr., etc., Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 5, 2017

Citations

154 A.D.3d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
60 N.Y.S.3d 831