From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haywood v. Rispoli

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 3, 2024
24-cv-01537-VC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-01537-VC

06-03-2024

CAMERON L. HAYWOOD, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY RISPOLI, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL RE: DKT. NO. 2

VINCE CHHABRIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This case was opened when Cameron L. Haywood filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and an incomplete application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Dkt. Nos. 1, 2. Haywood was sent a notice that he had not paid the filing fee or properly applied for leave to proceed IFP and was allowed twenty-eight days to pay the fee or file the complete application. A copy of the court's form for applications to proceed IFP was provided with the notice. Twenty-eight days have passed, and Haywood has not filed an IFP application, or otherwise communicated with the court. This case is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice and the incomplete motion to proceed IFP (Dkt. No. 2) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Haywood v. Rispoli

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 3, 2024
24-cv-01537-VC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Haywood v. Rispoli

Case Details

Full title:CAMERON L. HAYWOOD, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY RISPOLI, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 3, 2024

Citations

24-cv-01537-VC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2024)