From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayward v. State Dept. of Audit

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Jun 18, 1981
430 A.2d 1111 (Me. 1981)

Opinion

Argued June 16, 1981.

Decided June 18, 1981.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Kennebec County.

Harry N. Starbranch (orally), Augusta, for plaintiff.

James E. Tierney, Atty. Gen., Robert J. Stolt, Deputy Atty. Gen. (orally), Augusta, for appellee.

Before WERNICK, GODFREY, ROBERTS and CARTER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Harold Dale Hayward appeals from the pro forma decree dismissing his petition for award of compensation on grounds of lack of notice. 39 M.R.S.A. § 63. Hayward contends on appeal that the evidence establishes that his employer, Department of Audit, "had knowledge of the injury" so as to excuse the failure to give notice. 39 M.R.S.A. § 64. The Commissioner was warranted in finding that, although the employer was aware that Hayward wore a Thomas collar, it "was aware of neither the cause nor the extent of the alleged injury." Knowledge by the employer of an injury is insufficient without knowledge that the injury is, or may be, work related. Murray v. T.W. Dick Co., Inc., Me., 398 A.2d 390, 391-92 (1979). That Hayward claims that his own testimony would support a different conclusion is of no consequence on appeal. Dunton v. Eastern Fine Paper Co., Me., 423 A.2d 512, 518 (1980).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

It is ordered that the employer pay to the employee an allowance of $300.00 for his counsel fees plus his reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for this appeal.

All concurring.


Summaries of

Hayward v. State Dept. of Audit

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Jun 18, 1981
430 A.2d 1111 (Me. 1981)
Case details for

Hayward v. State Dept. of Audit

Case Details

Full title:Harold Dale HAYWARD v. STATE of Maine DEPARTMENT OF AUDIT

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Jun 18, 1981

Citations

430 A.2d 1111 (Me. 1981)