From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haynesworth v. Gonzalez

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Mar 25, 2020
181 A.D.3d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2018–06770

03-25-2020

In the Matter of Russell HAYNESWORTH, Appellant, v. Eric GONZALEZ, Respondent.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of counsel), respondent pro se.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Lisa Napoli of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of counsel), respondent pro se.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., RUTH C. BALKIN, JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, BETSY BARROS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER In a proceeding to unseal grand jury minutes based on CPL 190.25(4)(a), the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (William M. Harrington, J.), entered May 4, 2018. The order denied the petition.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for an in camera review of the grand jury minutes and a new determination thereafter of the petition.

The petitioner was convicted, upon a jury verdict, of robbery in the first degree (see People v. Haynesworth, 153 A.D.3d 1278, 62 N.Y.S.3d 407 ). On his appeal, this Court modified the judgment of conviction by reducing his sentence and affirmed the judgment as so modified (see id. at 1278, 62 N.Y.S.3d 407 ). He commenced this proceeding to unseal the grand jury minutes relating to his indictment based on CPL 190.25(4)(a). In an order entered May 4, 2018, the Supreme Court denied the petition. The petitioner appeals.

Under the particular circumstances presented, including, inter alia, the petitioner's submissions and the respondent's concession that the Supreme Court could review the grand jury minutes in camera to determine the petition, we disagree with the court's determination to deny the petition without reviewing the grand jury minutes in camera. Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for an in camera review of the grand jury minutes and a new determination thereafter of the petition.

MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, LEVENTHAL and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Haynesworth v. Gonzalez

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Mar 25, 2020
181 A.D.3d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Haynesworth v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Russell Haynesworth, appellant, v. Eric Gonzalez…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Mar 25, 2020

Citations

181 A.D.3d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 2080
119 N.Y.S.3d 869