From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haynes v. Warden, N. Cent. Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 19, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-860 (WOB) (S.D. Ohio Nov. 19, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-860 (WOB)

11-19-2013

COURTNEY HAYNES PETITIONER v. WARDEN, NORTH CENTRAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION RESPONDENT


JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. #11), and having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by Petitioner (Doc. #20), and the Court having sufficiently considered the matter, and being advised,

IT IS ORDERED that the objections be, and they hereby are, overruled; that the Report and Recommendation be, and it hereby is, adopted as the finding of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. #8) is granted; that petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #2), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be, and it hereby is, denied as time-barred, and this matter is hereby dismissed from the docket of this court. A certificate of appealability shall not issue with respect to any of the claims alleged herein. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), any appeal of this judgment would not be taken in good faith.

Signed By:

William O. Bertelsman

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Haynes v. Warden, N. Cent. Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 19, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-860 (WOB) (S.D. Ohio Nov. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Haynes v. Warden, N. Cent. Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:COURTNEY HAYNES PETITIONER v. WARDEN, NORTH CENTRAL CORRECTIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 19, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-860 (WOB) (S.D. Ohio Nov. 19, 2013)