Haynes v. Rosario

Full title: MICHAEL D. HAYNES, Plaintiff, v. D. ROSARIO, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 3, 2015

2:12-cv-3018 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2015)

Opinion

MICHAEL D. HAYNES, Plaintiff, v. D. ROSARIO, Defendant. No. 2:12-cv-3018 KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 3, 2015

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Both parties consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By order filed August 13, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within fourteen days, why this action should not be dismissed. The fourteen day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The November 30, 2015 jury trial date before the undersigned is vacated; and

         2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).