From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haynes v. Planet Automall, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Sep 7, 2011
09-CV-03880 (JBW) (RER) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 7, 2011)

Opinion

09-CV-03880 (JBW) (RER).

September 7, 2011


MEMORANDUM ORDER


On August 15, 2011, the court entered a memorandum and order denying plaintiff's motion for class certification ("August 15 Order"). Plaintiff now moves for reconsideration of the court's denial of class certification with regard to plaintiff's claim under section 349 of the New York General Business Law and the court's determination that plaintiff is not an adequate representative of the class.

Plaintiff's motion is denied. No reason has been given to reconsider the court's August 15 Order. None of the grounds for relief from a court order articulated in rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have been shown. The court thoroughly considered the issues raised in plaintiff's motion to reconsider when it denied class certification in its August 15 Order.

Plaintiff's motion to adjourn the trial and pre-trial brief schedule is denied. Trial on plaintiff's individual claims shall proceed on September 12, 2011.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 6, 2011

Brooklyn, New York


Summaries of

Haynes v. Planet Automall, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Sep 7, 2011
09-CV-03880 (JBW) (RER) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Haynes v. Planet Automall, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SHERRI HAYNES, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Sep 7, 2011

Citations

09-CV-03880 (JBW) (RER) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 7, 2011)