Haynes v. Neb. Dep't of Corr. Servs.

4 Citing cases

  1. Mathiesen v. Kellogg

    315 Neb. 840 (Neb. 2024)   Cited 7 times

    Where the assignments of error consist of headings or subparts of arguments and are not within a designated assignments of error section, an appellate court may proceed as though the party failed to file a brief, providing no review at all, or, alternatively, may examine the proceedings for plain error.Haynes v. Nebraska Dept. of Corr. Servs., 314 Neb. 771, 993 N.W.2d 97 (2023). ANALYSIS

  2. Fountain II, LLC v. Douglas Cnty. Bd. of Equalization

    315 Neb. 633 (Neb. 2024)   Cited 4 times

    In re Interest of T.W., 314 Neb. 475, 991 N.W.2d 280 (2023). Haynes v. Nebraska Dept. of Corr. Servs., 314 Neb. 771, 993 N.W.2d 97 (2023). State v. McColery, 301 Neb. 516, 919 N.W.2d 153 (2018)

  3. Noland v. Yost

    315 Neb. 568 (Neb. 2023)   Cited 8 times

    An appellate court independently reviews questions of law decided by a lower court. Haynes v. Nebraska Dept. of Corr. Servs., 314 Neb. 771, 993 N.W.2d 97 (2023). Plain error is error plainly evident from the record and of such a nature that to leave it uncorrected would result in damage to the integrity, reputation, or fairness of the judicial process. 

  4. State v. Harris

    No. A-23-718 (Neb. Ct. App. Nov. 19, 2024)

    A poverty affidavit serves as a substitute for the docket fee otherwise required upon appeal, and an in forma pauperis appeal is perfected when the appellant timely files a notice of appeal and a proper affidavit of poverty. Haynes v. Nebraska Dept. of Corr. Servs., 314 Neb. 771, 993 N.W.2d 97 (2023). Nebraska case law generally holds that once an appeal has been perfected, the trial court is divested of its jurisdiction to hear a case involving the same matter between the same parties.