From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haygood v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Nov 13, 2015
Civil No. 15-cv-302-SM (D.N.H. Nov. 13, 2015)

Opinion

Civil No. 15-cv-302-SM

11-13-2015

Johnny Haygood v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Berlin, New Hampshire

cc: Johnny Haygood, pro se


ORDER

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated October 15, 2015, for the reasons set forth therein. "'[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.'" School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). Additionally, finding that the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Rule 11, Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254; First Cir. LR 22.0.

The Petitioner's § 2241 Petition is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

Steven J. McAuliffe

United States District Judge
Date: November 13, 2015 cc: Johnny Haygood, pro se


Summaries of

Haygood v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Nov 13, 2015
Civil No. 15-cv-302-SM (D.N.H. Nov. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Haygood v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:Johnny Haygood v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Berlin, New…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: Nov 13, 2015

Citations

Civil No. 15-cv-302-SM (D.N.H. Nov. 13, 2015)

Citing Cases

Harris v. Warden

Petitioner is not permitted to proceed with his § 2241 petition to raise his Johnson-related arguments at…

Dixon v. Hastings

While it may be that the Johnson decision will allow for the filing of a second or successive Section 2255…