From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayes v. Hayes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 26, 1976
325 So. 2d 455 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. Y-33.

January 26, 1976.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Escambia County, Ernest E. Mason, J.

John E. Venn, Jr., Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith Cutler, Tampa, for appellant.

Louis K. Rosenbloum and David H. Levin, Levin, Warfield, Graff, Mabie Rosenbloum, Pensacola, for appellee.


Appellant appeals from a final judgment in a dissolution of marriage case which denied her claim for permanent or for rehabilitative alimony. Appellant contends the trial court erred in refusing to award her either permanent or rehabilitative alimony, and in failing to reserve jurisdiction to award appropriate alimony at a future date, if sought, and if allowable.

Because the judgment is clothed with a presumption of correctness, and because the trial court has broad discretion, we find no error in its denial of alimony. However, it is our opinion that the judgment should have specifically reserved jurisdiction to award alimony at a future date, if applied for, and if allowable. Nichols v. Nichols, 304 So.2d 497 (Fla.App. 1st, 1974).

Affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions to modify the judgment to specifically reserve jurisdiction to award alimony at a future date, if applied for, and if allowable under Chapter 61, Florida Statutes.

BOYER, C.J., and CAWTHON, VICTOR M., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Hayes v. Hayes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 26, 1976
325 So. 2d 455 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Hayes v. Hayes

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY C. HAYES, APPELLANT (RESPONDENT), v. JERRY L. HAYES, APPELLEE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 26, 1976

Citations

325 So. 2d 455 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Quick v. Quick

The chancellor having reserved jurisdiction to enter "such additional orders as may be necessary and proper,"…

Lockwood v. Lockwood

Further, this opinion is in keeping with the policy of Section 61.08 which is to do equity and justice…