From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayden v. Quarterman

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Jan 21, 2010
No. 3:98-CV-455-D (N.D. Tex. Jan. 21, 2010)

Opinion

No. 3:98-CV-455-D.

January 21, 2010


ORDER


After conducting a de novo review, the court finds that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hayden v. Quarterman

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Jan 21, 2010
No. 3:98-CV-455-D (N.D. Tex. Jan. 21, 2010)
Case details for

Hayden v. Quarterman

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND HAYDEN, 553626, Petitioner, v. NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Jan 21, 2010

Citations

No. 3:98-CV-455-D (N.D. Tex. Jan. 21, 2010)

Citing Cases

Dailey v. U.S.

He asserts that only Rules 60(b)(1)-(3) are governed by a one-year limitations period and that his motion was…

Cisneros v. United States

Irrespective of how it is pled, thirteen years to file a 60(b) motion is untimely, by any standard. See…