From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayde v. Taber

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 28, 2023
2:23-cv-1131 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-1131 AC P

12-28-2023

ERIC RYAN HAYDE, Plaintiff, v. TAMARA TABER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff has filed a motion for extension of time to file a response to defendant's answer. ECF No. 21. However, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not contemplate a response to an answer unless ordered by the court. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1)(C). This court has not ordered a response to the answer, and any response to the answer will be stricken from the record unless it was ordered filed by the court.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 21) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Hayde v. Taber

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 28, 2023
2:23-cv-1131 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Hayde v. Taber

Case Details

Full title:ERIC RYAN HAYDE, Plaintiff, v. TAMARA TABER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 28, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-1131 AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2023)