From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayat v. Lnu

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Jan 24, 2022
No. CIV-21-1163-HE (W.D. Okla. Jan. 24, 2022)

Opinion

CIV-21-1163-HE

01-24-2022

ADAM HAYAT, Petitioner, v. FNU LNU, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner Adam Hayat filed this case seeking relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell for initial proceedings. After reviewing petitioner's filings, Judge Erwin issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the petitioner be construed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition and transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.

The Report advised petitioner of his right to object to the Report by January 3, 2022. Petitioner has not objected to the Report thereby waiving his right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues it addressed. Casanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010).

Petitioner has filed a notice to the court outlining his purported Due Process allegations, but the notice is dated December 14, 2021 - the same date the Report issued - and received by the court December 20, 2021.

Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #5].

Petitioner's petition, construed as a § 2255 petition, is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hayat v. Lnu

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Jan 24, 2022
No. CIV-21-1163-HE (W.D. Okla. Jan. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Hayat v. Lnu

Case Details

Full title:ADAM HAYAT, Petitioner, v. FNU LNU, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 24, 2022

Citations

No. CIV-21-1163-HE (W.D. Okla. Jan. 24, 2022)