Summary
In Hawkins v. Union Trust Company, 187 App. Div. 472, 175 N.Y.S. 694, in a letter delivered by the donor to the mother of the donee and by her to the donee, this language appeared, "`You will remember this is my birthday.
Summary of this case from Foster v. ReissOpinion
May 2, 1919.
William J. Dawley of counsel [ Joseph T. Cashman, attorney], for the appellant.
Wolcott P. Robbins of counsel [ Wolcott G. Lane and Peter B. Olney, Jr., with him on the brief; Miller, King, Lane Trafford, attorneys], for the respondent.
The action was against the executor of William W. Cole to recover possession of a steam yacht. The plaintiff's claim to right of possession is by a gift from Cole in his lifetime. That gift was evidenced by a letter which was delivered to the plaintiff's mother for plaintiff and by the plaintiff's mother to the plaintiff. That letter is as follows:
"31 UNION SQUARE, NEW YORK. February 9, 1915.
"FRANK HAWKINS. — I have just been talking to your mother and given you my boat which she asked me to write and tell you about. Call when you are over this way and I will tell you more about it. If necessary I will assist you to establish yourself, if you think you would care to take this way of making a living up. With your knowledge of mechanics I feel you could make something out of it. You will remember this is my birthday. In celebration of this fact I give you my boat. Take care of your health and your mother.
"Yours truly, "W.W. COLE."
This yacht which is the subject of the gift had not been used for six years and was in storage somewhere not far from New York city. Shortly after the delivery of this letter the donor died.
In the case of Matter of Cohn ( 187 App. Div. 392), handed down herewith, the effect of the delivery of an instrument of gift without the actual delivery of the articles given is discussed. Upon principle, as well as upon the authority of this decision, I am of the opinion that this gift was completed upon the delivery of this letter to the plaintiff, and the trial court was in error in dismissing plaintiff's complaint.
The judgment is, therefore, reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.
CLARKE, P.J., and SHEARN, J., concurred; DOWLING and PAGE, JJ., dissented.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.