From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawkins v. Hoskinson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
May 15, 1959
324 S.W.2d 399 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959)

Opinion

May 15, 1959.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Bullitt County, W.R. Gentry, J.

Tom B. Givhan, Shepherdsville, for appellants.

C.V. Sanders, Shepherdsville, for appellee.


This action involves priority of liens. It will be unnecessary, however, to discuss the merits of the case.

Appellants designated a partial record for the purpose of appeal and did not serve a concise statement of points on which they intended to rely. Appellee contends that the appeal should therefore be dismissed. Civil Rule 75.04 provides as follows:

"No assignment of errors is necessary. If the appellant does not designate for inclusion the complete record and all the proceedings and evidence in the action, he shall serve with his designation a concise statement of the points on which he intends to rely on the appeal. The complete record, for the purpose of this Rule, does not include nonessential orders, summons, subpoenas, notices and similar papers."

Under the authority of Knight v. Resolute Insurance Co., Ky., 321 S.W.2d 255, we must agree with the appellee.

The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Hawkins v. Hoskinson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
May 15, 1959
324 S.W.2d 399 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959)
Case details for

Hawkins v. Hoskinson

Case Details

Full title:Warren R. HAWKINS et al., Appellants, v. Lillie Mae HOSKINSON, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: May 15, 1959

Citations

324 S.W.2d 399 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959)

Citing Cases

Louisville Gas Electric Company v. Patterson

After filing its notice of appeal the condemnor in accordance with CR 75.01 designated specific portions of…

Commonwealth v. Black

Consequently, we dismiss actions for noncompliance with rules governing the requisite steps. United Mine…