Opinion
No. 32404
Decided January 17, 1951.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Libel — Limitation of actions — Saving clause where action dismissed otherwise than on merits — Section 11233, General Code — Successive actions after such dismissals barred, when — Day in court — Due process — Section 16, Article I, Constitution — Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.
Mr. George S. Hawke, in propria persona. Messrs. Frost Jacobs, Mr. Charles G. Puchta, Jr., and Mr. Francis L. Dale, for appellees.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.