From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawke v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Apr 8, 2009
Case No. 3:07cv00108 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 8, 2009)

Summary

holding that the Commissioner was not substantially justified when the ALJ failed to provide good reasons even though other evidence potentially supported the ALJ

Summary of this case from Gilbert v. Comm'n of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

Case No. 3:07cv00108.

April 8, 2009


DECISION AND ENTRY


The Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #21), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby adopts said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations filed on March 17, 2009 (Doc. #21) is ADOPTED in full;
2. Plaintiff's Motion For Attorney Fees Under Equal Access To Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (Doc. #17) is GRANTED;
3. Plaintiff is granted an award of attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of $4,386.25; and
4. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.


Summaries of

Hawke v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Apr 8, 2009
Case No. 3:07cv00108 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 8, 2009)

holding that the Commissioner was not substantially justified when the ALJ failed to provide good reasons even though other evidence potentially supported the ALJ

Summary of this case from Gilbert v. Comm'n of Soc. Sec.

collecting courts of appeals cases

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Astrue
Case details for

Hawke v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JOE R. HAWKE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Apr 8, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:07cv00108 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 8, 2009)

Citing Cases

Rothgeb v. Astrue

By ignoring these notes, and focusing instead on other notes taken out of context, the ALJ erred. See Loza v.…

Rothgeb v. Astrue

By ignoring these notes, and focusing instead on other notes taken out of context, the ALJ erred. See Loza v.…