Opinion
Case No. 1:20-cv-81
02-26-2021
Magistrate Judge Stephanie Bowman ORDER
On February 1, 2021, Magistrate Judge Bowman issued a Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") (Doc. 12) recommending that Defendant's decision be found to be SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, and AFFIRMED, and that this case be CLOSED. The R&R advised the parties that failing to object within 14 days would constitute a forfeiture of the right to review. (R&R at #1617 (first citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); then United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981))).
Now, the time period for objection has run, and no party has objected. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). "There is no indication that Congress, in enacting § 636(b)(1)(C), intended to require a district judge to review a magistrate's report to which no objections are filed." Thomas, 474 U.S. at 152; see also Berskhire v. Beauvais, 928 F.3d 520, 530-31 (6th Cir. 2019) (noting "fail[ure] to file an objection to the magistrate judge's R&R ... is forfeiture"). Thus, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Bowman's R&R (Doc. 12), which finds the Defendant's decision to be SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, and AFFIRMED, and DIRECTS the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.
SO ORDERED. February 26, 2021
DATE
/s/ _________
DOUGLAS R. COLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE