Opinion
Argued February 12, 1892
Decided March 1, 1892
Brainard Tolles for appellant. Edward B. Hill for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Haviland v. Manhattan Railway Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 1, 1892
30 N.E. 865 (N.Y. 1892)
Summaries of
Haviland v. Manhattan Railway Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 1, 1892
30 N.E. 865 (N.Y. 1892)
Case details for
Haviland v. Manhattan Railway Company
Case Details
Full title:MERRITT E. HAVILAND, as Executor, etc., Respondent, v . THE MANHATTAN…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 1, 1892
Citations
30 N.E. 865 (N.Y. 1892)
30 N.E. 865
Citing Cases
Boll v. Condie-Bray Glass & Paint Co.
(a) The master is not liable to the servant for injuries resulting from overexertion. Hunter v. Busy Bee…
Tayer v. York Ice Mach. Corp.(1) The court erred in submitting the case to the jury, because there was no evidence that the cracking of…