From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hausermann v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Jan 18, 2000
14 S.W.3d 152 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED 75674

OPINION FILED: January 18, 2000 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 2, 2000 Application for Transfer Denied April 25, 2000

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, BERNHARDT C. DRUMM, III.

Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Beck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., P.J., KENT E. KAROHL, J. and MARY K. Hoff, J.



ORDER


Donald R. Hausermann (movant) appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hausermann v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Jan 18, 2000
14 S.W.3d 152 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Hausermann v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD R. HAUSERMANN, APPELLANT, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Jan 18, 2000

Citations

14 S.W.3d 152 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)