From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hausch v. Topper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 27, 1995
221 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 27, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the defendants' motion is denied, the plaintiff's cross motion is granted, the stay of foreclosure is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, to set a date for the foreclosure sale of the real property.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in staying the foreclosure sale (see, CPLR 2201). A review of the record indicates that the defendants wholly failed to establish any fact to support their position that the deceased mortgagor had violated the Banking Law in making the mortgage (see, Banking Law § 590 [a]). O'Brien, J.P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hausch v. Topper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 27, 1995
221 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Hausch v. Topper

Case Details

Full title:VIVIAN L. HAUSCH, Appellant, v. MARY D. TOPPER et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 27, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 496