Haughton v. State

Full title: Garrick HAUGHTON, Appellant, v. STATE Of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Dec 10, 2014

152 So. 3d 797 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

Nos. 4D13–530 4D13–531.

12-10-2014

Garrick HAUGHTON, Appellant, v. STATE Of Florida, Appellee.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant's adjudications and sentences in these two consolidated appeals presented under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), but remand for the trial court to enter a written order which specifies the conditions of probation appellant was found to have violated in lower court case number 502008CF009036A. See Turner v. State, 84 So.3d 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) ; Petrie v. State, 980 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Appellant need not be present. Affirmed but remanded with instructions.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.