From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haughton v. F.W.D. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 1993
193 A.D.2d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

May 24, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenstein, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

We find that contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, their motion was for reargument of a prior motion which was denied by an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenstein, J.), entered November 7, 1990. The motion to reargue was made after the time to take the appeal from the order entered November 7, 1990, had expired and was therefore untimely, since it is well settled that a motion to reargue cannot be used to extend the time to appeal (see, Catalogue Serv. v Insurance Co., 90 A.D.2d 838). Sullivan, J.P., Balletta, Lawrence and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Haughton v. F.W.D. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 1993
193 A.D.2d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Haughton v. F.W.D. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA HAUGHTON et al., Appellants, v. F.W.D. CORP. et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 24, 1993

Citations

193 A.D.2d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
598 N.Y.S.2d 994

Citing Cases

Vigo v. 501 Second St. Holding Corp.

This contention is incorrect. Only a motion to dismiss an action or a defense, in accordance with CPLR…

People v. Green

Generally, a motion to reargue does not extend, or toll the running of, a statutorily imposed time limitation…