From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haughbrook v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 26, 1995
658 So. 2d 639 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 95-00930.

July 26, 1995.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Daniel T. Andrews, Judge.


Herman Haughbrook appeals the denial of his motion brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court properly rejected his motion because it was not properly sworn. The denial of his claim is, however, without prejudice, and he may refile a properly sworn motion in the trial court. Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 1993). Haughbrook may refile his motion within 30 days from the date of this opinion and such a prompt refiling will not be time barred. Miller v. State, 617 So.2d 332 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

THREADGILL, C.J., and QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Haughbrook v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 26, 1995
658 So. 2d 639 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Haughbrook v. State

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN HAUGHBROOK, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 26, 1995

Citations

658 So. 2d 639 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Pavey v. State

Since it appears that the two-year time limit for Pavey to file a rule 3.850 motion has expired during the…

Hickey v. State

The Second District has specifically permitted the movant 30 days within which to refile. See Haughbrook v.…