From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hatton v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 16, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-00459 JFM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-00459 JFM

07-16-2013

DONALD JAMES BRUCE HATTON, Plaintiff, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant.


ORDER AND

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed May 31, 2013, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. ECF No. 5. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

_________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hatton v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 16, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-00459 JFM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Hatton v. California

Case Details

Full title:DONALD JAMES BRUCE HATTON, Plaintiff, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 16, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-00459 JFM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2013)