From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hatten v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Ins.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 21, 2013
(S.D. Ohio Aug. 21, 2013)

Opinion

08-21-2013

JUSTIN HATTEN, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, Respondent.


Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 28) AND DENYING PETITIONER'S

MOTION FOR PAUPER STATUS (Doc. 26)

This civil case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington. (Doc. 28). The Magistrate Judge recommends that Petitioner's Motion for Pauper Status be denied. (Id.) Petitioner did not file objections to the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and the time for doing so has expired. The issues are now ripe for decision by the Court.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge in the Report and Recommendations de novo. Upon review the issues presented, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge in its entirety (Doc. 28) and DENIES Petitioner's Motion for Pauper Status (Doc. 26).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

Timothy S. Blacks

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hatten v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Ins.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 21, 2013
(S.D. Ohio Aug. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Hatten v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Ins.

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN HATTEN, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Chillicothe Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 21, 2013

Citations

(S.D. Ohio Aug. 21, 2013)