Hatherley v. Pfizer, Inc.

Full title: AMANDA HATHERLEY, individually, and as personal representative of the…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 27, 2013

CIV. 2:13-00719 WBS CKD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2013)

Opinion

AMANDA HATHERLEY, individually, and as personal representative of the estate of BRAYDEN HATHERLEY-LONG, Plaintiffs, v. PFIZER, INC., a Delaware Corporation; PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC, a New York Limited Liability Corporation; MCKESSON CORPORATION, individually and d/b/a NORTHSTAR RX LLC, a Delaware Corporation; WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. No. CIV. 2:13-00719 WBS CKD United States District Court, E.D. California. June 27, 2013

          ORDER

          WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

         Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), because oral argument will not be of material assistance in deciding plaintiffs' motion to remand, (Docket No. 11), and defendants' motion to stay, (Docket No. 10), the court orders these matters submitted on the briefs. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearings set for July 1, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. are hereby vacated, and the parties' stipulation to continue the hearings to July 29, 2013 (Docket No. 22) is rejected.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.