From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hatcher v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
Jul 9, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-145-JMS-WGH (S.D. Ind. Jul. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-145-JMS-WGH

07-09-2012

ROBERT HATCHER, Plaintiff, v. RUTH JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.


Entry and Order Dismissing Action


I.

This civil rights action brought against public defenders representing the plaintiff in a pending appeal in the Indiana Court of Appeals is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) because the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. This conclusion is reached because the defendants have not acted, and do not act, under color of state law in representing the plaintiff. See Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 324 (1981) (public defender does not act under color of state law when performing a lawyer's traditional functions as counsel to a defendant in a criminal case).

II.

The foregoing shows that the defendants cannot be liable to the plaintiff under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The dismissal of the action is now mandatory. Gladney v. Pendleton Corr. Facility, 302 F.3d 773, 775 (7th Cir. 2002).

Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge

United States District Court

Southern District of Indiana

Distribution:

Robert Hatcher

#112855

Putnamville Correctional Facility

Inmate Mail/Parcels

1946 West U.S. Hwy 40

Greencastle, IN 46135


Summaries of

Hatcher v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
Jul 9, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-145-JMS-WGH (S.D. Ind. Jul. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Hatcher v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT HATCHER, Plaintiff, v. RUTH JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Date published: Jul 9, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-145-JMS-WGH (S.D. Ind. Jul. 9, 2012)