From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hastings v. Skipper Day

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 20, 2002
832 So. 2d 133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 2D01-4372, 2D02-491

Opinion filed September 20, 2002. Rehearing Denied December 19, 2002.

Appeal from final judgment and nonfinal order of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Anthony Rondolino, Judge.

Michael Moran of Law Office of Michael Moran, Sarasota, for Herbert Hastings and American Sign Company.

Jesse L. Skipper of Jesse L. Skipper, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Skipper Day.


In these consolidated cases, Herbert Hastings appeals from a final judgment awarding damages to Skipper Day. Skipper Day, on the other hand, challenges the trial court's denial of its motion for attorney's fees sought pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2001).

We write only to note that since the time the trial court's decisions were rendered, the Florida Supreme Court has issued two opinions concerning costs. In Amerace Corp. v. Stallings, 27 Fla. L. Weekly S566 (Fla. June 13, 2002), the court held that interest on a jury verdict does not begin to accrue until the date of judgment. The court in White v. Steak Ale of Florida, Inc., 816 So.2d 546 (Fla. 2002), concluded that a "judgment obtained" pursuant to section 768.79 includes the plaintiff's taxable costs up to the date of the offer. We have considered both of these decisions and find no error in the trial court's determination that attorney's fees should not be awarded.

Affirmed.

FULMER and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Hastings v. Skipper Day

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 20, 2002
832 So. 2d 133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Hastings v. Skipper Day

Case Details

Full title:HERBERT HASTINGS, Appellant, v. SKIPPER DAY, a partnership, Appellee…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 20, 2002

Citations

832 So. 2d 133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Naab v. Smith

) 88 N.W. 739; Ward's Will (Wisc.) 35 N.W. 731; Hastings v. Day (Iowa) 130 N.W. 134. The Wisconsin statute is…

In re Wills of Proestler

Such being the case, it is our duty to "recognize and enforce the rules and principles of the common law,"…