From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hastings v. Astrue

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division
Aug 20, 2009
Case No. 08-CV-2190 (C.D. Ill. Aug. 20, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 08-CV-2190.

August 20, 2009


ORDER


Reports and Recommendations (#17), (#18) were filed by Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal in the above cause on July 31, 2009. On August 17, 2009, Defendant, Deanna L. Hastings, filed her Objections to the Reports and Recommendations (#19). Following this court's careful de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's reasoning and Defendant's Objection, this court agrees with and accepts the Magistrate Judge's Reports and Recommendations (#17), (#18). This court agrees that Defendant's Motion for an Order Which Affirms the Commissioner's Decision (#15) should be GRANTED and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand (#12) should be DENIED.

(1) The Reports and Recommendations (#17), (#18) are accepted by this court.

(2) Defendant's Motion for an Order Which Affirms the Commissioner's Decision (#15) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand (#12) is DENIED.

(3) This case is terminated.


Summaries of

Hastings v. Astrue

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division
Aug 20, 2009
Case No. 08-CV-2190 (C.D. Ill. Aug. 20, 2009)
Case details for

Hastings v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DEANNA L. HASTINGS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division

Date published: Aug 20, 2009

Citations

Case No. 08-CV-2190 (C.D. Ill. Aug. 20, 2009)

Citing Cases

Wheeler v. Astrue

In fact, the cases show that the ALJ is permitted to consider the claimant's work during the alleged…

Bailey v. Astrue

Bailey does not cite any case law or statutes to support his argument that the ALJ committed legal error by…