From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hassfurter v. Garrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 1, 1924
210 App. Div. 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)

Opinion

June, 1924.


Award reversed and claim remitted to the State Industrial Board, with costs to the appellant against said Board to abide the event. Since there is not a loss of two or more fingers or of two or more phalanges of two or more fingers compensation may not be proportioned to the loss of use of the hand. (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 3, q.) Compensation should be awarded under section 15, subdivisions 3, i, j, l and s, for the total loss of the second finger and for the proportionate loss of use of the third and fourth fingers, of each of which claimant has suffered a permanent partial loss of use. All concur.


Summaries of

Hassfurter v. Garrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 1, 1924
210 App. Div. 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)
Case details for

Hassfurter v. Garrison

Case Details

Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent. FREDERICK HASSFURTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1924

Citations

210 App. Div. 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)

Citing Cases

Matter of Rounds v. Davis Furniture Co.

This being so, the State Industrial Board was correct in its first awards, one for the loss of the phalange…